<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State of the Blogosphere, another excuse for people to misquote numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim FInin</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim FInin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Looking at data from bloglines users, we&#039;ve concluded that

  - The feeds that really matter (FTRMs) are a very small fraction of blogosphere
  - FTRMs double each year, not each six months
  - Most users follow a modest number of feeds

For details, see http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/04/18/preferential-attachment-in-feeds/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at data from bloglines users, we&#8217;ve concluded that</p>
<p>  &#8211; The feeds that really matter (FTRMs) are a very small fraction of blogosphere<br />
  &#8211; FTRMs double each year, not each six months<br />
  &#8211; Most users follow a modest number of feeds</p>
<p>For details, see <a href="http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/04/18/preferential-attachment-in-feeds/" rel="nofollow">http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2006/04/18/preferential-attachment-in-feeds/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday Linkfest: April 18, 2006 &#187; Technology, Blogging and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday Linkfest: April 18, 2006 &#187; Technology, Blogging and Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Sifry of Technorati publishes an appropriately self-aggrandizing &quot;State of the Blogosphere&quot; but as Duncan points out, the numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Sifry of Technorati publishes an appropriately self-aggrandizing &#8220;State of the Blogosphere&#8221; but as Duncan points out, the numbers should be taken with a grain of salt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/18/the-state-of-the-blogosphere-another-excuse-for-people-to-misquote-numbers/#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>Phew, did a quick check when I blogged that and I&#039;m happy to say I didn&#039;t fall for the misquote. :-)

I guess many folks simply assume Technorati is the be-all and end-all of blog tracking - when based on the numbers 35m/200m they only cover around 20% of what&#039;s out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew, did a quick check when I blogged that and I&#8217;m happy to say I didn&#8217;t fall for the misquote. <img src='http://www.duncanriley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I guess many folks simply assume Technorati is the be-all and end-all of blog tracking &#8211; when based on the numbers 35m/200m they only cover around 20% of what&#8217;s out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
