Comments on: Digging a bloody great big hole. http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/ blogging is not a spectator sport Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:41:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: The Dirt on Suspicious Digging at Digg.com… » Yet Another Linux Blog http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-291578 The Dirt on Suspicious Digging at Digg.com… » Yet Another Linux Blog Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:26:31 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/#comment-291578 [...] DuncanRiley.com chimes in [...] [...] DuncanRiley.com chimes in [...]

]]> By: Splasho http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-1944 Splasho Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:55:37 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/#comment-1944 If you want a good summary you might want to mention that IMO one thing that got it major attention was this submission to reddit http://reddit.com/info/4p19/comments (mine) and then about an hour later this http://reddit.com/info/4p29/comments For a long time they were the top 2 on reddit, and the majority of my hits (several thousand) came from there before slashdot got it. If you want a good summary you might want to mention that IMO one thing that got it major attention was this submission to reddit http://reddit.com/info/4p19/comments (mine) and then about an hour later this http://reddit.com/info/4p29/comments

For a long time they were the top 2 on reddit, and the majority of my hits (several thousand) came from there before slashdot got it.

]]> By: Steve http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-1895 Steve Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:24:40 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/#comment-1895 "Digg results start going wonky. Posts with 44 diggs make the front page. Something is going on at Digg, something very strange." I've seen front page stories with fewer diggs. It's a function of both number of diggs and rate (i.e. one that gets 40 diggs in an hour vs. 40 diggs in a day) “Digg results start going wonky. Posts with 44 diggs make the front page. Something is going on at Digg, something very strange.”

I’ve seen front page stories with fewer diggs. It’s a function of both number of diggs and rate (i.e. one that gets 40 diggs in an hour vs. 40 diggs in a day)

]]> By: jangelo http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-1894 jangelo Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:08:58 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/#comment-1894 Great commentary, Duncan! I'm still hoping for a better response by Kevin and/or the DIGG crew on this issue. Great commentary, Duncan! I’m still hoping for a better response by Kevin and/or the DIGG crew on this issue.

]]> By: Breezy http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-1891 Breezy Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:56:22 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/04/21/digging-a-bloody-great-big-hole/#comment-1891 I just read his followup - http://forevergeek.com/news/responding_to_kevins_nonresponse_post.php - and the last point makes a lot of sense: if that site was banned for spamming, why was it unbanned? I just read his followup – http://forevergeek.com/news/responding_to_kevins_nonresponse_post.php – and the last point makes a lot of sense: if that site was banned for spamming, why was it unbanned?

]]>