Comments on: Techcrunch under fire http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/ blogging is not a spectator sport Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:57:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: music downloads free http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-179933 music downloads free Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:31:30 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-179933 Hi, there!..303c3d4c8f723bd7d06e94694a17fead Hi, there!..303c3d4c8f723bd7d06e94694a17fead

]]> By: ypfxjsrbtn http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-155002 ypfxjsrbtn Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:37:58 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-155002 Thanks for this site! <a href="http://www.ceval.de/redaxo/index.html">ceval.de</a> Thanks for this site!
ceval.de

]]> By: chartreuse (BETA) » Blog Archive » The Advantages Of Prostitution (Or TechCrunch, Duncan Riley And What Really Happens At Weddings Or The Daily Remix Escort Edition) http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-10497 chartreuse (BETA) » Blog Archive » The Advantages Of Prostitution (Or TechCrunch, Duncan Riley And What Really Happens At Weddings Or The Daily Remix Escort Edition) Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:36:09 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-10497 [...] Duncan Riley and the B5 crew decided to take the offensive and defend themselves against supporting alleged spammers. [...] [...] Duncan Riley and the B5 crew decided to take the offensive and defend themselves against supporting alleged spammers. [...]

]]> By: duncan http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-10427 duncan Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:22:12 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-10427 I think there is a world of difference though between black hat seo marketing. search engine spamming techniques and "organic" search engine links, again, we feature this links in a "marketplace" (on most sites that I'm aware of) and highlight them for our visitors to click on, as this is, as far as I'm concerned, what we are being paid for. At the end of the day it's really no different to me giving a friend a link in a side bar or a post, or even Mike Arrington giving a plug (yet again :-) ) to a Web 2.0 company in the post: every link (except naturally comments in WordPress due to link nofollow) is something that search engines pick up: should we stop these as well? I think there is a world of difference though between black hat seo marketing. search engine spamming techniques and “organic” search engine links, again, we feature this links in a “marketplace” (on most sites that I’m aware of) and highlight them for our visitors to click on, as this is, as far as I’m concerned, what we are being paid for. At the end of the day it’s really no different to me giving a friend a link in a side bar or a post, or even Mike Arrington giving a plug (yet again :-) ) to a Web 2.0 company in the post: every link (except naturally comments in WordPress due to link nofollow) is something that search engines pick up: should we stop these as well?

]]> By: Adam Kalsey http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-10425 Adam Kalsey Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:09:54 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-10425 If all that Text Link Ads and their advertisers cared about, the ads weould be inserted using Javascript. It's easier, has a larger pool of potential publishers (more peole can insert javascript than PHP/Perl/ASP/etc), and can provide exactly the same look and traffic to the end user. The ONLY reason for using a server-side language is to make the ad links appear to be an organic part of the web page and therefore influence search rankings. In fact, the number one reason that Text Link Ads lists as a reason to advertise with them is: "Text Link Ads are served as static links that can help your natural (organic) search engine rankings." http://www.text-link-ads.com/textlinkads.php The only difference between this and blog comment spamming is that Text Link Ads is paying the bloggers for polluting their space. If all that Text Link Ads and their advertisers cared about, the ads weould be inserted using Javascript. It’s easier, has a larger pool of potential publishers (more peole can insert javascript than PHP/Perl/ASP/etc), and can provide exactly the same look and traffic to the end user. The ONLY reason for using a server-side language is to make the ad links appear to be an organic part of the web page and therefore influence search rankings.

In fact, the number one reason that Text Link Ads lists as a reason to advertise with them is: “Text Link Ads are served as static links that can help your natural (organic) search engine rankings.” http://www.text-link-ads.com/textlinkads.php

The only difference between this and blog comment spamming is that Text Link Ads is paying the bloggers for polluting their space.

]]> By: Shane http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-10382 Shane Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:46:23 +0000 http://duncanriley.com/2006/06/22/techcrunch-under-fire/#comment-10382 Man I just started making money and figuring a few things out and now I have to figure something else out. Man I just started making money and figuring a few things out and now I have to figure something else out.

]]>