By: Dead2.0 » Should VCs fund bloggers’ wet dreams?

Dead2.0 » Should VCs fund bloggers’ wet dreams? — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:38:50 +0000

[...] The term “blogging” alone is enough to cause a ruckus in some circles.?É‚Äö?Ç Some people think it’s a personal thing, others think it’s the opposite.?É‚Äö?Ç Some are motivated by ego.?É‚Äö?Ç Wait, no, all are motivated by ego.?É‚Äö?Ç And as I’ve previously reported, virtually all humans (and even some pets) are doing it (and I’m not the only one who doesn’t like the numbers).?É‚Äö?Ç For most of us, it’s some form of hobby.?É‚Äö?Ç Or an outlet.?É‚Äö?Ç Or a career move.?É‚Äö?Ç And some have hit the big time.?É‚Äö?Ç But all want to. [...]

By: Mitesh

Mitesh — Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:28:35 +0000

Hey,
read your comment on micropersuasion.com and replied to it. About activity, out of the ~13 million profiles I scanned, more than 10 million are inactive, which can tell us as much about the activity of blogs, if any. I agree the numbers are high and out of them, the no. of real active bloggers is a very small percentage. You can read more here if interested:
http://miteshvasa.blogspot.com/2006/06/blogalysisbloganalysis.html

Comments on: 72 million blogs on Windows Live Spaces, do you believe me now about Technorati?

By: Dead2.0 » Should VCs fund bloggers’ wet dreams?

By: Mitesh