<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is communist chic so cool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MattGar</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-142730</link>
		<dc:creator>MattGar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-142730</guid>
		<description>Thanks for good post! Thats what i&#039;ve been looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for good post! Thats what i&#8217;ve been looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-27236</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-27236</guid>
		<description>The examples you give (Doomsday Clock, safety drills, etc) were not because of Communism, per se, they existed because of the ideological conflict between &quot;capitalism&quot; and &quot;communism&quot;. If communism was the only economic system practiced in the world, there would be no need for those things. In other words, it&#039;s not communism you&#039;re opposing, but the war between communism and capitalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The examples you give (Doomsday Clock, safety drills, etc) were not because of Communism, per se, they existed because of the ideological conflict between &#8220;capitalism&#8221; and &#8220;communism&#8221;. If communism was the only economic system practiced in the world, there would be no need for those things. In other words, it&#8217;s not communism you&#8217;re opposing, but the war between communism and capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-26878</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-26878</guid>
		<description>I think the answer&#039;s pretty easy on this one -- what&#039;s bad is good ... and the level of acceptableness is inverse to how good our memory is about how bad that &quot;bad&quot; thing was.

Nazi Germany and its atrocities still live on in public memory, in pop culture, in movies, in radio and so on.

Not so with Communist Russia.

Cheers,
t @ dji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the answer&#8217;s pretty easy on this one &#8212; what&#8217;s bad is good &#8230; and the level of acceptableness is inverse to how good our memory is about how bad that &#8220;bad&#8221; thing was.</p>
<p>Nazi Germany and its atrocities still live on in public memory, in pop culture, in movies, in radio and so on.</p>
<p>Not so with Communist Russia.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
t @ dji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-26794</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 07:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-26794</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify that last, after an in-depth read of the site: 

Anyone with a modicum of historical understanding about worker movements *should* find its poseur affectations extremely annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify that last, after an in-depth read of the site: </p>
<p>Anyone with a modicum of historical understanding about worker movements *should* find its poseur affectations extremely annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-26789</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-26789</guid>
		<description>People seem to think it means &quot;I&#039;m a proud working man who is fighting the Establishment (except not really, it&#039;s a cool pose)&quot;. Sort of like &quot;Goth&quot; as a club for loners, but with colors.

There&#039;s some sociological names for this, some sort of appropriation (like when rich kids wear symbols of peasant revolutionaries).

I suspect any bona-fide Communist (if there are any still in existence) would find it extremely annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People seem to think it means &#8220;I&#8217;m a proud working man who is fighting the Establishment (except not really, it&#8217;s a cool pose)&#8221;. Sort of like &#8220;Goth&#8221; as a club for loners, but with colors.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some sociological names for this, some sort of appropriation (like when rich kids wear symbols of peasant revolutionaries).</p>
<p>I suspect any bona-fide Communist (if there are any still in existence) would find it extremely annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Kravchenko</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-26788</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Kravchenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-26788</guid>
		<description>Rather than commenting on the article itself i have posted a reply on my blog at stasik.wordpress.com. Would like to see it as the start of the discussion rather than some sort of criticism towards the author. I only applaude Duncan for his knowledge of Communism era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than commenting on the article itself i have posted a reply on my blog at stasik.wordpress.com. Would like to see it as the start of the discussion rather than some sort of criticism towards the author. I only applaude Duncan for his knowledge of Communism era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Why is communist chic so cool?&#8221; - My response to Duncan Riley &#171; Anti-Depressant</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-26787</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Why is communist chic so cool?&#8221; - My response to Duncan Riley &#171; Anti-Depressant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncanriley.com/2006/09/05/why-is-communist-chic-so-cool/#comment-26787</guid>
		<description>[...] duncanriley.com 5/09/06 11:53 AM duncan  Comments    Posted by stasik Filed in personal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] duncanriley.com 5/09/06 11:53 AM duncan  Comments    Posted by stasik Filed in personal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
