<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom is fickle: the national disgrace of press freedom, or the lack there of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/comment-page-1/#comment-136558</link>
		<dc:creator>Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/#comment-136558</guid>
		<description>Hi Sam! Photos i send on e-mail. 
Green</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam! Photos i send on e-mail.<br />
Green</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/comment-page-1/#comment-39047</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/#comment-39047</guid>
		<description>http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/036233
for streaming video, but I also recall earlier than this the government talking about licensing online video in the same way as TV stations are licensed: the theory went that both a broadcasters. I cant find a direct link but in this:
http://www.refused-classification.com/internet_06-05to05.htm
there&#039;s Coonan talking about the Government considering licensing online video:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Going forward, it is our clear objective to regulate as little as possible anything that is a general internet stream or service. The rationale behind wanting to think about licensing was really to make sure that consumers had?É¬¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?¢‚Ç¨¬ùand I think consumers would want this?É¬¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?¢‚Ç¨¬ùa level of confidence and comfort in the government having at least some kind of potential ability to supervise if somebody wanted to set up, for instance, a pornography television channel or a terrorist training television channel.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So maybe I jumped the gun a little bit, they were thinking about it, and given all the ho-ha with the recent media changes with any luck they&#039;ve either forgotten about it, or dropped it as an idea altogether (touch wood) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/036233" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/036233</a><br />
for streaming video, but I also recall earlier than this the government talking about licensing online video in the same way as TV stations are licensed: the theory went that both a broadcasters. I cant find a direct link but in this:<br />
<a href="http://www.refused-classification.com/internet_06-05to05.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.refused-classification.com/internet_06-05to05.htm</a><br />
there&#8217;s Coonan talking about the Government considering licensing online video:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Going forward, it is our clear objective to regulate as little as possible anything that is a general internet stream or service. The rationale behind wanting to think about licensing was really to make sure that consumers had?É¬¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?¢‚Ç¨¬ùand I think consumers would want this?É¬¢?¢‚Äö¬¨?¢‚Ç¨¬ùa level of confidence and comfort in the government having at least some kind of potential ability to supervise if somebody wanted to set up, for instance, a pornography television channel or a terrorist training television channel.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So maybe I jumped the gun a little bit, they were thinking about it, and given all the ho-ha with the recent media changes with any luck they&#8217;ve either forgotten about it, or dropped it as an idea altogether (touch wood) <img src='http://www.duncanriley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Angry</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/comment-page-1/#comment-39045</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/#comment-39045</guid>
		<description>Duncan, do you have any more info on the prospect of vloggers needing to be licensed?  I hadn&#039;t heard about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, do you have any more info on the prospect of vloggers needing to be licensed?  I hadn&#8217;t heard about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paull Young</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/comment-page-1/#comment-38839</link>
		<dc:creator>Paull Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/25/freedom-is-fickle-the-national-disgrace-of-press-freedom-or-the-lack-there-of/#comment-38839</guid>
		<description>Well said Duncan. 

It is a disgrace, and we really should be happy with nothing but first place on this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Duncan. </p>
<p>It is a disgrace, and we really should be happy with nothing but first place on this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
