<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! to buy AOL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Angry</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-40814</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/#comment-40814</guid>
		<description>I know it feels like &quot;there&#039;ll never be another...&quot; but before Google we thought there&#039;d never be another Microsoft.  There&#039;s always something we don&#039;t know about just around the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it feels like &#8220;there&#8217;ll never be another&#8230;&#8221; but before Google we thought there&#8217;d never be another Microsoft.  There&#8217;s always something we don&#8217;t know about just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerging Earth - Yahoo Looking at AOL</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-40794</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerging Earth - Yahoo Looking at AOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2006/10/30/yahoo-to-buy-aol/#comment-40794</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t like this idea and it probably has more to do with how Duncan (thanks for the tip)?É‚Äö?Ç feels about it as well. It just means one less player in the market to keep everyone on their toes. I&#8217;ve shared my thoughts before on AOL, and think that getting out of the ISP market and move purely into the content arena is exactly where AOL needs to be now. I believe they should really try to move themselves into any content that could be considered popular in America. The epicenter of pop-culture if you will. Really capitalize on becoming the idea behind being &#8220;America: Online&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t like this idea and it probably has more to do with how Duncan (thanks for the tip)?É‚Äö?Ç feels about it as well. It just means one less player in the market to keep everyone on their toes. I&#8217;ve shared my thoughts before on AOL, and think that getting out of the ISP market and move purely into the content arena is exactly where AOL needs to be now. I believe they should really try to move themselves into any content that could be considered popular in America. The epicenter of pop-culture if you will. Really capitalize on becoming the idea behind being &#8220;America: Online&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
