<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bryanboy struck by the Shared Hosting scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: billlosos</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-309967</link>
		<dc:creator>billlosos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-309967</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://xtupload.com&quot; title=&quot;free image hosting&quot;&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
<p><a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting">free image hosting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-96474</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-96474</guid>
		<description>Partially true Scott, yes you&#039;ve got the problem with shared boxes, but they don&#039;t strike you out if you&#039;re using too many resources, they at least talk to you about it, and there&#039;s no actual limit (per a post by them) which is a whole lot better than the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partially true Scott, yes you&#8217;ve got the problem with shared boxes, but they don&#8217;t strike you out if you&#8217;re using too many resources, they at least talk to you about it, and there&#8217;s no actual limit (per a post by them) which is a whole lot better than the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-96425</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-96425</guid>
		<description>@Caz -- if you are moving to DreamHost for CPU reasons, then forget about it. It is still a shared hosting with heavily loaded boxes. They provide great storage and bandwidth, but a few busy dynamic sites (say 10k unique a day on WP) can still get you into trouble.

Try a good VPS company if you can&#039;t yet afford dedicated servers. They are still shared, but are having far less accounts on each server. Much cheaper as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Caz &#8212; if you are moving to DreamHost for CPU reasons, then forget about it. It is still a shared hosting with heavily loaded boxes. They provide great storage and bandwidth, but a few busy dynamic sites (say 10k unique a day on WP) can still get you into trouble.</p>
<p>Try a good VPS company if you can&#8217;t yet afford dedicated servers. They are still shared, but are having far less accounts on each server. Much cheaper as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caz</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-95992</link>
		<dc:creator>Caz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-95992</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re about to move to Dreamhost for CPU reasons. It was getting a bit tetchy with our old host and we moved late last year to Routhost. It&#039;s been an absolute nightmare ever since - all CPU load related. I 100% agree about how misleading it is. If they give you a crapload of bandwidth and you are using that bandwidth it&#039;s reasonable to expect you&#039;ll use a fair bit of CPU resources as well.

If Dreamhost doesn&#039;t work out I guess that its a dedicated server  - if we can afford it - or else I guess it&#039;s time to call it a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re about to move to Dreamhost for CPU reasons. It was getting a bit tetchy with our old host and we moved late last year to Routhost. It&#8217;s been an absolute nightmare ever since &#8211; all CPU load related. I 100% agree about how misleading it is. If they give you a crapload of bandwidth and you are using that bandwidth it&#8217;s reasonable to expect you&#8217;ll use a fair bit of CPU resources as well.</p>
<p>If Dreamhost doesn&#8217;t work out I guess that its a dedicated server  &#8211; if we can afford it &#8211; or else I guess it&#8217;s time to call it a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Krug</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-95704</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-95704</guid>
		<description>I use MidPhase and there have been a few minor burps but overall I consider them top rate. Who would try to serve a high bandwidth site on a shared account? It&#039;s rock stupid. 

You really do get what you pay for. I&#039;m currently on a VPS and I&#039;m honestly looking to upgrade to a dedicated server. So that I can monitor bandwidth issues a bit better now that I&#039;m hosting podcasts and I plan to start hosting video so that becomes even more an issue. 

Again its about what you pay for. 

I consider MidPhase top rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use MidPhase and there have been a few minor burps but overall I consider them top rate. Who would try to serve a high bandwidth site on a shared account? It&#8217;s rock stupid. </p>
<p>You really do get what you pay for. I&#8217;m currently on a VPS and I&#8217;m honestly looking to upgrade to a dedicated server. So that I can monitor bandwidth issues a bit better now that I&#8217;m hosting podcasts and I plan to start hosting video so that becomes even more an issue. </p>
<p>Again its about what you pay for. </p>
<p>I consider MidPhase top rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Neumann</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/comment-page-1/#comment-95691</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/01/19/bryanboy-struck-by-the-shared-hosting-scam/#comment-95691</guid>
		<description>Aw crap, I was shortly going to move everything over to MidPhase on the basis of Brian Clark&#039;s (CopyBlogger / Tubetorial) very strong recommendations.

I guess I gotta look real closer now before committing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw crap, I was shortly going to move everything over to MidPhase on the basis of Brian Clark&#8217;s (CopyBlogger / Tubetorial) very strong recommendations.</p>
<p>I guess I gotta look real closer now before committing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
