<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future of Web 2.0 is here, and it&#8217;s sound asleep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/comment-page-1/#comment-127013</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/#comment-127013</guid>
		<description>The bubble was due to insane investment and IPOs for companies with products that no one used.

* Justin.tv has likely taken minute investment compared with with bubble times.
* It doesn&#039;t matter if you think justin.tv is stupid as long as people use the site.

In addition, I don&#039;t even understand why people think there is a bubble.  Have a look at VC investment over the last 10 years:

http://tinyurl.com/yrv7x2

The apparent bubble is due to the effusion of new sites stemming from a massive increase in programmer productivity and cheap hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bubble was due to insane investment and IPOs for companies with products that no one used.</p>
<p>* Justin.tv has likely taken minute investment compared with with bubble times.<br />
* It doesn&#8217;t matter if you think justin.tv is stupid as long as people use the site.</p>
<p>In addition, I don&#8217;t even understand why people think there is a bubble.  Have a look at VC investment over the last 10 years:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yrv7x2" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yrv7&#215;2</a></p>
<p>The apparent bubble is due to the effusion of new sites stemming from a massive increase in programmer productivity and cheap hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truman Show meets Web 2.0: Former Kiko coworkers launch Justin.tv</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/comment-page-1/#comment-123769</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truman Show meets Web 2.0: Former Kiko coworkers launch Justin.tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2007/03/19/the-future-of-web-20-is-here-and-its-sound-asleep/#comment-123769</guid>
		<description>[...] Could Justin.tv be the fourth horseman of the Web 2.0 Apocalypse as some have predicted? (Was Kiko the first?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could Justin.tv be the fourth horseman of the Web 2.0 Apocalypse as some have predicted? (Was Kiko the first?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
