<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia 2020 Kind Of Covers Tech, Kind Of Doesn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; So who&#8217;s ready for the future? Who&#8217;s not?</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-243896</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; So who&#8217;s ready for the future? Who&#8217;s not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/#comment-243896</guid>
		<description>[...] focus isn&#8217;t mentioned by name somewhere: Gisela Kaplan on the environment; Duncan Riley on tech; Yvonne Zeniou on the parents of disabled children. Folks, a &#8220;vision for the future&#8221; is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] focus isn&#8217;t mentioned by name somewhere: Gisela Kaplan on the environment; Duncan Riley on tech; Yvonne Zeniou on the parents of disabled children. Folks, a &#8220;vision for the future&#8221; is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-237868</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/#comment-237868</guid>
		<description>IMHO we need to offer a better environment for the intermingling creative/content/software industries, with targeted tax breaks (as suggested), R&amp;D and incubation support for these &#039;softer&#039; industries, as opposed to just the hard sciences, etc.

We have a talented pool of tech/creative types, but we need to ensure they aren&#039;t all snapped up in Australia arms of multi-nationals (although a spin-off effect means they&#039;re often incubators as well, at least optimistically.)

It&#039;s tempting to think that govt. should favour Oz vendors as much as possible, and encourage use of OSS (it&#039;s happening) inc. govt. contribution (e.g. localisation) if not in development, then in openly available support info maybe.

Perhaps Unis could be encouraged, by various means, to further use and develop OSS (in addition to commercial opportunities) perhaps in collaboration with govt. (via Ed Depts, CSIRO etc.), to increase the base of tech-savvy developers and potential entrepreneurs.

Obviously govt. needs to be more &#039;creative&#039; with our tech infrastructure issues (the hardest nut!), and avoid situations like the data-casting restrictions, or uneven marketplace.

Finally ABC/SBS/AFC see further funding to increase the accessibility (and quality) of Australian content in the new mediums. ...of course the only way to encourage the audience/users to &#039;use&#039; local content and apps is via quality/value, but even that&#039;s no guarantee... how do we pull users away from YouTube, Google, MS/Yahoo etc...?

That&#039;s a tough one, and some of it runs pretty deeply (we&#039;ve always tended to look elsewhere for &#039;the best&#039;.)

Ultimately we need to raise the profile, and dare I say it, &#039;sexiness&#039; of local technology and become a place that&#039;s proud of our home-grown technology and innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO we need to offer a better environment for the intermingling creative/content/software industries, with targeted tax breaks (as suggested), R&amp;D and incubation support for these &#8217;softer&#8217; industries, as opposed to just the hard sciences, etc.</p>
<p>We have a talented pool of tech/creative types, but we need to ensure they aren&#8217;t all snapped up in Australia arms of multi-nationals (although a spin-off effect means they&#8217;re often incubators as well, at least optimistically.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tempting to think that govt. should favour Oz vendors as much as possible, and encourage use of OSS (it&#8217;s happening) inc. govt. contribution (e.g. localisation) if not in development, then in openly available support info maybe.</p>
<p>Perhaps Unis could be encouraged, by various means, to further use and develop OSS (in addition to commercial opportunities) perhaps in collaboration with govt. (via Ed Depts, CSIRO etc.), to increase the base of tech-savvy developers and potential entrepreneurs.</p>
<p>Obviously govt. needs to be more &#8216;creative&#8217; with our tech infrastructure issues (the hardest nut!), and avoid situations like the data-casting restrictions, or uneven marketplace.</p>
<p>Finally ABC/SBS/AFC see further funding to increase the accessibility (and quality) of Australian content in the new mediums. &#8230;of course the only way to encourage the audience/users to &#8216;use&#8217; local content and apps is via quality/value, but even that&#8217;s no guarantee&#8230; how do we pull users away from YouTube, Google, MS/Yahoo etc&#8230;?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tough one, and some of it runs pretty deeply (we&#8217;ve always tended to look elsewhere for &#8216;the best&#8217;.)</p>
<p>Ultimately we need to raise the profile, and dare I say it, &#8217;sexiness&#8217; of local technology and become a place that&#8217;s proud of our home-grown technology and innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-236822</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/#comment-236822</guid>
		<description>If you get in the first idea you should propose is a tax break for web startups that target the global market, similar to the one they had for film years back.  Australia is making all of this money in the mining industry and the only thing we are investing in is property, more mining companies and banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get in the first idea you should propose is a tax break for web startups that target the global market, similar to the one they had for film years back.  Australia is making all of this money in the mining industry and the only thing we are investing in is property, more mining companies and banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-232487</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/02/11/australia-2020-kind-of-covers-tech-kind-of-doesnt/#comment-232487</guid>
		<description>You should &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.australia2020.gov.au/nominations/index.cfm&quot;&gt;nominate yourself&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should <a href="http://www.australia2020.gov.au/nominations/index.cfm">nominate yourself</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
