Comments on: Obama supporter attacked, media silent http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/10/26/obama-supporter-attacked-media-silent/ blogging is not a spectator sport Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:41:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Keith http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/10/26/obama-supporter-attacked-media-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-338452 Keith Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:30:54 +0000 http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1446#comment-338452 Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on. <br><br>I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so. <br><br>The media "should" report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election. <br><br>While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates. <br><br>I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS. Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on.

I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so.

The media “should” report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election.

While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates.

I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS.

]]> By: Keith http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/10/26/obama-supporter-attacked-media-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-337937 Keith Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:30:54 +0000 http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1446#comment-337937 Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on. <br><br>I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so. <br><br>The media "should" report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election. <br><br>While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates. <br><br>I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS. Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on.

I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so.

The media “should” report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election.

While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates.

I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS.

]]> By: Keith http://www.duncanriley.com/2008/10/26/obama-supporter-attacked-media-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-308181 Keith Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:30:54 +0000 http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1446#comment-308181 Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on. <br><br>I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so. <br><br>The media "should" report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election. <br><br>While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates. <br><br>I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS. Are you really trying to say the media is biased to McCain? Come on.

I really don't think either incident deserved any media, but I don't think half of what the media put out is relevant to the election, they are CLEARLY taking sides, and I question the ethics in doing so.

The media “should” report the facts, not political rhetoric that is clearly aimed at getting one candidate elected. It has probably been my biggest turn off of this election.

While there are channels (Fox) who are biased to McCain, the majority of the media are supporting Obama. Newspapers are endorsing Obama. Radio channels only play commercials from Democratic candidates.

I am trying my best to decipher truth from rhetoric, and I can't see through the fog of BS.

]]>