Courier Mail: Stephen Conroy’s internet filter ‘won’t stop child porn’
Question then, if it won’t stop child porn, why do it at all?
After all, it was Conroy who continually said that the filter was all about child porn.
“Black lists are needed to combat child pornography” Conroy (The West)
On the overall policy: “It also focuses on managing current threats through technical mechanisms such as ISP-level filtering of illegal material including child pornography.” Conroy (speech)
“Central to the Government?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢s plan to make the internet a safer place for children is the introduction of Internet Service Provider (ISP) level filtering of material such as child pornography.” Conroy (media release)
“Conroy told the media that it would censor online child pornography and other ?¢‚Ǩ?ìinappropriate material”" WSWS
“If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree.” Conroy (ABC)
“We are not building the Great Wall of China. We are going after the filth – like child pornography. Its been done around the world and it can be done here.” Conroy (IT News)
The last quote is important: Conroy now claims that the filter isn’t a silver bullet, but said that the filter was all about blocking child porn, which he now says it won’t stop.
So what is it then?
Time to go Senator Conroy, if you keep up these backflips you’ll end up with a broken back.
One last quote out of the UK, which I think fits here
BT admitted that the UK’s “Cleanfeed” scheme was “intended to prevent users inadvertently accessing illegal material, rather than to stop hardened paedophiles.” ZDNet
Sort of sums up Conroy’s policy doesn’t it.