<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBN Numbers Part Two: why it may never cover its costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NBN at $200/ month? Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-322698</link>
		<dc:creator>NBN at $200/ month? Maybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-322698</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote earlier in the week about how the numbers don&#8217;t stack up for the NBN when you consider the need to repay the cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote earlier in the week about how the numbers don&#8217;t stack up for the NBN when you consider the need to repay the cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-338356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-338356</guid>
		<description>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-337911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-337911</guid>
		<description>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-322555</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 05:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-322555</guid>
		<description>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telstra will also lower their prices, so the take up rate could be slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-322488</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-322488</guid>
		<description>One major assumption you&#039;re making here is that the NBN will exclude business access / participation. What happens to the costs when you factor those into the equation? OK, so large corporates in metropolitan areas may already have their own access (but so would households), but there must be hundreds of thousands of small businesses which could also benefit - normally paying rates higher than individual consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One major assumption you&#39;re making here is that the NBN will exclude business access / participation. What happens to the costs when you factor those into the equation? OK, so large corporates in metropolitan areas may already have their own access (but so would households), but there must be hundreds of thousands of small businesses which could also benefit &#8211; normally paying rates higher than individual consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriswere.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NBN Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-322467</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswere.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NBN Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-322467</guid>
		<description>[...] Riley has made some interesting comments about the cost of the governments announced fibre optic broadband network. He argues that the cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Riley has made some interesting comments about the cost of the governments announced fibre optic broadband network. He argues that the cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/04/08/nbn-numbers-part-two-why-it-may-never-cover-its-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-322469</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1559#comment-322469</guid>
		<description>&quot;does anyone really believe that this will still be state of the art tech in 2038&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It wouldn&#039;t surprise me that this will still be a very god solution in 2050. We are still using copper wires that have been around for 50+ years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For further reasoning why, see my blog post regarding this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chriswere.com/?p=129&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chriswere.com/?p=129&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;does anyone really believe that this will still be state of the art tech in 2038&#8243;</p>
<p>It wouldn&#39;t surprise me that this will still be a very god solution in 2050. We are still using copper wires that have been around for 50+ years.</p>
<p>For further reasoning why, see my blog post regarding this: <a href="http://www.chriswere.com/?p=129" rel="nofollow">http://www.chriswere.com/?p=129</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
