<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utegate: it&#8217;s not the lobbying that&#8217;s dodgy, it&#8217;s the lying about the lobbying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-326557</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1601#comment-326557</guid>
		<description>thanks for the post =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the post =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-326532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1601#comment-326532</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that it could well be Malcolm Turnbull who is really the one being set up here.&lt;br&gt;He is unforgivably naive to rant about this email, call for resignations,  and then admit he has never even seen it!&lt;br&gt;So, who wants his job now that Costello is no longer a danger?&lt;br&gt;If I was Malcolm I&#039;d be looking long and hard at the original source of this story (who he is not publically naming).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that it could well be Malcolm Turnbull who is really the one being set up here.<br />He is unforgivably naive to rant about this email, call for resignations,  and then admit he has never even seen it!<br />So, who wants his job now that Costello is no longer a danger?<br />If I was Malcolm I&#39;d be looking long and hard at the original source of this story (who he is not publically naming).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Howarth</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-326496</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Howarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1601#comment-326496</guid>
		<description>Hey Duncan - have to concede that I&#039;m not familiar with all the intricacies of this one, but how do you derive it being a &#039;known fact&#039; that Treasury helped his mate? I would agree with anyone who says that proof of such actions would require the strongest possible action, but all that I&#039;m aware of at the moment is an email that even the Opposition has not seen, and the testimony of a Treasury official whose own recollection is - by his admission - not entirely crystal clear. Also, at the moment the allegation is that the PMO assisted Rudd&#039;s mate, not the Treasury. Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong on any of this. Fascinating set of developments, but potentially a storm in a teacup? Looking forward to finding out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Duncan &#8211; have to concede that I&#39;m not familiar with all the intricacies of this one, but how do you derive it being a &#39;known fact&#39; that Treasury helped his mate? I would agree with anyone who says that proof of such actions would require the strongest possible action, but all that I&#39;m aware of at the moment is an email that even the Opposition has not seen, and the testimony of a Treasury official whose own recollection is &#8211; by his admission &#8211; not entirely crystal clear. Also, at the moment the allegation is that the PMO assisted Rudd&#39;s mate, not the Treasury. Please correct me if I&#39;m wrong on any of this. Fascinating set of developments, but potentially a storm in a teacup? Looking forward to finding out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-326487</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1601#comment-326487</guid>
		<description>I think this is more serious:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg5l9J4Qj1k&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg5l9J4Qj1k&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone&#039;s life depends on it. Keep yur word, Mr Rudd. Your statement is produced near the end of that video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is more serious:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg5l9J4Qj1k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg5l9J4Qj1k</a></p>
<p>Someone&#39;s life depends on it. Keep yur word, Mr Rudd. Your statement is produced near the end of that video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hel?É¬©na </title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/2009/06/20/utegate-its-not-the-lobbying-thats-dodgy-its-the-lying-about-the-lobbying/comment-page-1/#comment-326433</link>
		<dc:creator>Hel?É¬©na </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1601#comment-326433</guid>
		<description>it may be Mr Turnbull having to explain why he lied to parliament if there is no email, which at the moment looks very doubtful - interesting days ahead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may be Mr Turnbull having to explain why he lied to parliament if there is no email, which at the moment looks very doubtful &#8211; interesting days ahead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
