<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>duncanriley.com &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duncanriley.com/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duncanriley.com</link>
	<description>blogging is not a spectator sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Woe</title>
		<link>http://www.duncanriley.com/firefox-woe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.duncanriley.com/firefox-woe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duncanriley.com/?p=1358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Rizzn Hopkins writes over at Mashable how he&#8217;s pissed off with Firefox. He&#8217;s not alone. I dumped Firefox 2 and switched to Flock after trying Safari for a short time (it doesn&#8217;t play nice with WordPress). Then I tried Webkit for a while, super fast, and now I&#8217;m back at Firefox 3 as everybody [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Rizzn Hopkins<a href="http://mashable.com/2008/04/30/daily-poll-is-a-good-browser-worth-money/"> writes over at Mashable</a> how he&#8217;s pissed off with Firefox. He&#8217;s not alone. I dumped Firefox 2 and switched to Flock after trying Safari for a short time (it doesn&#8217;t play nice with WordPress). Then I tried Webkit for a while, super fast, and now I&#8217;m back at Firefox 3 as everybody told me they&#8217;d finally fixed Firefox and all was good again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not good. It&#8217;s better, but its better than crappy. FF3 still crashes, still leaks memory (not always, but particularly on streaming video sites), and has other bugs that don&#8217;t make my day miserable, but they&#8217;re not a positive contribution either. Just going to write this post and I couldn&#8217;t type in FF3: had to close one tab (had less than 10 open) to get FF to allow me to type again. Maybe I&#8217;ve got rose colored glasses, but I think FF 1.5 will be remembered as the last great Firefox release, because I never remember having any of these problems then, even going back as far as 0.8 beta.</p>
<p>To answer Rizzn&#8217;s poll question: yes, I&#8217;d happily pay for a browser that was stable, quick and bug free. Note though that it would REALLY have to be all of those things, and so far I just haven&#8217;t seen a browser able to meet that criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.duncanriley.com/firefox-woe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

